On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:46:28PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100, > > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >What are your opinions about this? I already checked with Dennis > > >Gilmore, he is ok with this. > > > > Is there a fail against doing this in released versions? (Unless > > there is a legal reason to do the retirement, we wouldn't want to do > > that for a package in a release.) > > It will be done only for Rawhide and Branched (until the Final Change > Deadline) and maybe EPEL if desired. Wether or not to e.g. retire > packages for other releases without blocking them in Koji needs to be > decided. > > Regards > Till Sounds like a good idea to me. Also seems like it is important enough to run inside the infrastructure environment so that it can be monitored. The #fedora-apps team has been working on pkgdb2 which the authors hope to deploy shortly after the F20 release. Restricting retirement rights to the automated process shouldn't be a problem.
Attachment:
pgpwvG758bmPp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
