On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:39:38 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > Here is a quick and dirty spec implementing the idea I described: > [1]. From what I can see it behaves correctly with any combination > of packages and subpackages installed. Am I missing something? > [1] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/somepackage.spec There were always intentions to allow installing multiple *-debuginfo.rpm versions at once. This would allow for example examining a core file generated from older binaries (which could be still running when they crashed while newer rpm was installed on disk). Currently it is not possible but one such open Bug with some proposals is: undesired cross-rpm elf build-id duplication due to strict content-hash handling in debugedit.c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002341 (In ideal case for debug purposes one needs also the matching binary, not just its debuginfo. But in practice the debuginfo should be sufficient.) In reality ABRT solves the problem of multi debuginfo rpms by installing new chroot each time with the needed package versions. This is a bit expensive. Your proposal definitely blocks this multiple *-debuginfo.rpm versions idea. But the multi-version idea has never worked yet and it is not sure it will ever be. Your proposal is sure still better than what we have now. Besides that your proposal has to be implemented into rpm tool code; currently the debuginfo subpackage is implemented only as a rpm macro in /usr/lib/rpm. But that is sure OK. Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
