Jan Kratochvil wrote: > There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together for > example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed: > Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151598 The problem with those dependencies is that -debuginfo covers all the subpackages, so which one should it require? All of them? That's more often than not NOT what I want. (E.g., do we really want to force everyone to install gcc-* just because ABRT/DrKonqi/whatever wants to install the (usually unneeded) debugging information for libgcc? Getting gcc-debuginfo dragged in is bad enough!) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
