On 26.11.2013 11:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mar 26 novembre 2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together
for
example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151598
The problem with those dependencies is that -debuginfo covers all the
subpackages, so which one should it require? All of them? That's more
often
than not NOT what I want.
Just conflict with all subpackages that do not match the exact debuginfo
version
Regards,
Is there some rpm macro magic to list all the (sub)packages defined in a
spec?
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
