On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 10:27 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > That's why I said I wouldn't make libev-devel conflict with > > libevent-devel. > > > > I said I would put the event.h header from libev into a > > libev-libevent-devel subpacke, and only this one would conflict with > > libevent-devel. > > > > I presume libverto uses ev.h from libev and event.h from libevent, > > right? > > > > In that case, it would still do that just fine even after I make the > > changes. > > I believe that should work. I'm happy to fix the .pc upstream requirement of libverto. This proposal seems sensible to me. Thanks Nathaniel. As I mentioned elsewhere, I have just done this in Rawhide. Basically, the upstream changes for libverto should be trivial: - libevent installs its event.h header in /usr/include, so you can link to that directly - libev installs its ev.h and ev++.h in /usr/include as well, so you can link directly to that. And that's pretty much it, there shouldn't be anything for you to do, except stop requiring the libev pkgconfig file (which I dropped in Rawhide). With this change, libverto should then build on all distributions, as we were (afaik) the only ones shipping a pkgconfig file for libev. Let me know if I can help. -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
