Hi,
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 15:30 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> My plan is to do the following in Rawhide (the future Fedora 21) :
>
> * Move the headers back to /usr/include, as upstream intended
> * Put the event.h header into a libev-libevent-devel subpackage, and
> make it Conflicts: libevent-devel (this is what Debian did)
> * Drop our pkgconfig file.
I have just done that:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=480826
Repeating below the information I had gathered to help maintainers of
libev-using packages adapt their own packages.
I'd be happy to help fix those packages if needed, I just can't do it
myself (except for weighttp) as I'm neither a provenpackager nor a
co-maintainer.
> Here is the list of packages I could find with a build requirement on
> libev:
>
> $ repoquery --enablerepo=\*source --archlist=src --whatrequires 'pkgconfig(libev)' libev-devel
> awesome-0:3.5.1-8.fc20.src
> i3-0:4.6-1.fc20.src
> i3lock-0:2.5-2.fc20.src
> libverto-0:0.2.5-3.fc20.src
> ocaml-lwt-0:2.4.2-3.fc20.src
> picviz-0:0.6-12.fc20.src
> rubygem-passenger-0:4.0.18-2.fc20.src
> rubygem-passenger-0:4.0.18-4.fc20.src
> spectrum-0:1.4.8-11.fc20.src
> stud-0:0.3-4.20120814git.fc20.src
> weighttp-0:0.3-5.fc20.src
[... snip ...]
> awesome
> -------
>
> Our package has some downstream patches to require our Fedora-only
> pkgconfig file for libev.
>
> Making it build-require libev-devel instead and dropping this downstream
> patch should be enough.
>
> i3
> --
>
> Nothing should need to be done here.
>
> Upstream checks for libev with pkg-config, but it ignores errors. And
> once I move the libev headers in /usr/include, then they'll be found
> anyway.
>
> i3lock
> ------
>
> The spec file calls pkgconfig to find the libev headers.
>
> This should just be removed, and the package should build just fine, as
> intended by upstream.
>
> libverto
> --------
>
> Upstream itself requires the pkgconfig file for libev.
>
> That's just a terrible idea, as it means libverto won't build on e.g
> Debian, or with the upstream libev.
>
> libverto should be fixed upstream here IMHO.
>
> ocaml-lwt
> ---------
>
> The package has a patch to make it find the headers int he
> Fedora-specific location.
>
> It should be dropped, and that should be it.
>
> picviz
> ------
> The package has a patch to make it find the headers int he
> Fedora-specific location.
>
> It should be dropped, and that should be it.
>
> rubygem-passenger
> -----------------
>
> Upstream hardcodes -I/usr/include/libev in the cflags, which is only
> needed with our current libev package in Fedora, nowhere else.
>
> Anyway, the package should just build without any change once I move the
> libev headers to /usr/include.
>
> spectrum
> --------
>
> Upstream searches for the ev.h header in various folders, so things
> should continue to work without a change.
>
> stud
> ----
>
> Our package has a patch to hardcode -I/usr/include/libev in the CFLAGS.
>
> That can be dropped.
--
Mathieu
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
