On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:11:37 +0100 "puntogil@xxxxxxxxx" <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Il 07/11/2013 08:27, Manuel Faux ha scritto: > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:38:38 +0000 > > <devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-11-05 17:46:55) > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Faux wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is it correct that the NetBeans IDE is currently not packed for > >>>> Fedora? I checked the "netbeans" package, which was last built > >>>> for fc17. Is there any technical or license reason for this or is > >>>> just nobody packing it right now? > >>>> > >>> Someone from Sun used to be the maintainer and noone is doing it > >>> right now. No technical or licensing issues if anyone is > >>> interested in packaging it afaik. > >> More specifically look at: > >> > >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2010-November/003980.html > >> > >> Reason nobody picked it up is that is has relatively big dependency > >> chain and there was nobody interested enough (from maintainer > >> perspective). > > I have investigated the build process of NetBeans and I can just > > can go along with the fact that its dependency chain is quite long. > > Nevertheless I would like to reactivate it. If anyone is interested > > in helping, feel free to contact me. > > > > It seems like, that also netbeans-platform was not updated since > > quite a long time, which means that this package needs to be > > updated before. > > > > Manuel > hi, > see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetBeans_7.3 > gil Hi, I saw this page, but I could not find out, if anybody actually is working on this. All the TODO bugs are assigned to nobody and also the wiki page was not updated for a long time. Since you are the owner of this feature, is it okay to update it for NetBeans version 7.4 and go ahead with working on it? Manuel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
