Josh Boyer wrote:
> I don't think we need to force the same policy across all 3 products.
> I DO think we need to discuss adjusting the policy with the people
> that set the current policy though. That would be FESCo and the
> Board. I'm going to guess they have reasons for not allowing third
> party repositories to be automatically installed/enabled for reasons
> and they oversee the WGs, so bringing it up with them is the correct
> thing to do.
Having a list of third-party repositories which does not include RPM Fusion
is just a really bad joke, beyond useless. If we can't include RPM Fusion
(and Livna) in the list, it's better to not have such a list at all and let
users find the real, complete list on their own.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
