Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



<SNIP>
> > I would actually like to go a little further, and make it easy to enable
> > 'clean' third-party repositories. If we imagine a future where e.g.
> > valve is hosting a repository with their steam client, or say, the
> > chromium web browser is available from the a fedora people page, I would
> > really like it if searching for 'steam' or 'chromium' in gnome-software
> > would bring up a text that said something like: The software you are
> > looking for is available from a third-party repository. Do you want to
> > enable it ?
> 
> That was how I understood the original proposal.  And that's the
> conversation that needs to happen at a higher level outside of the WG
> before it can really be a reality.
> 
I don't think we need to push these decisions to be Fedora generic. There is no reason 
why the 3 products can't have different rule sets. Just because a policy would work
for the cloud image for instance doesn't mean it is the right one for the Workstation and vice versa.

Christian


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux