Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:14 PM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>
>> [> Lars Seipel wrote:]
>>>> You then basically need all that container stuff just so you can be a
>>>> little less scared at some application developer's broken attempts to
>>>> "enhance your user experience" by installing suid-root helpers or stuff
>>>> like that.
>>>
>>> Which they wouldn't be able to because it'd be sandboxed...
>>
>> That's his point. We need all the overhead of a sandbox just to (attempt to)
>> prevent apps from doing such nasty things, a problem we don't have in the
>> world of trusted repositories.
>
> Wrong.
>
> Nothing prevents users from downloading and running stuff from the web
> right now.  We have no sandbox.

Err "we have no sandbox so adding one would help not not hurt"
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux