Re: gnome software shell search provider? [Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 02.11.2013 22:29, schrieb Michael Scherer:
> Ars technica summarize quite clearly the situation on this problem :
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/its-the-little-things-how-small-conundrums-make-many-hate-computers/
> 
> And I do not even speak of the users who reboot during a upgrade,
> resulting into unbootable system due to issue like this
> ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002891 ). Sure, people
> shouldn't do it. Yet they do, that's purely a statistical problem. Maybe
> you do not see it with your small set of 20 servers, but with ~ 40 RHEL
> desktops in my office, I have seen it 4 times. I have spend ~ 2h to fix
> each of them. Now, take a bigger fleer of laptop, and count how much
> this is costing in time to a company. Time lost by users, time lost by
> having someone looking at it instead of focusing on others issues

strange - and instead fix the reboot/shutdown to delay the shutdown in case
of a running rpm/yum/dnf we go the crappy way of install updates offline
to work around statistics?

sorry, but i can't see the improvement here

in that case even windows is better which is technically wrong but with
such behavior and conclusions we sadly make it true

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux