Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:43:24PM +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>> See my comments about Jon Disnard later in my text, i assumed he was
>> still a community member only to hear about him being a RH employee
>> for less than a month now on Friday evening.
>
> I know what you mean here, but: being hired by Red Hat does not make someone
> cease to be a community member. I hope that we are *all* community members,
> regardless of employer. Many Fedora contributors who work for Red Hat are
> contributing to Fedora completely independently of their jobs, although a
> few of us are fortunate to be able to work on Fedora as a main focus.

I can see your point as I'm a Red Hatter that has zero allocated time
to work on Fedora, but most of the RHers that work on Fedora do so
because of what they're paid to work on and I believe (my opinion)
their focus primarily is directed around their $dayjob role and
there's a very few people (in the low teens as far as I'm aware) where
their only job is Fedora so in the vast majority of Red Hatters I
believe that their "community" role is the same or impacted based on
their paid $dayjob.

I'm some what disappointed in the over all community selection in the
CWG selection.

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux