python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream release 1.10.0
but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or LGPLv2)
<from upstream homepage>
pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 3.
So it should be good, no new review needed.
Tim
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 24, 2013 1:26 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right. So, I would suggest:
>
> Since the rename review is stalled, someone update and submit a new
> rename review (closing the old one as a duplicate) then get it
> reviewed.
>
> The only slight wrinkle in this is the folks who have commit on pycairo
> might also want such on the new python-cairo, as long as whoever
> submits the new rename review is ok with adding any of them that want
> it, I don't see an issue.I hope one of these people(also in python3-cairo) can submit a new review request.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
