On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:55:02 +0200 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:50:39AM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon > > > <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for > > > > the rename review request to be completed: > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0 > > It seems that the Provides and Obsoletes were done properly. > So there are still two issues: > 1. open bug > 2. python-cairo is still using pycairo repository name > > Essentially, the renaming isn't finished. Right. So, I would suggest: Since the rename review is stalled, someone update and submit a new rename review (closing the old one as a duplicate) then get it reviewed. The only slight wrinkle in this is the folks who have commit on pycairo might also want such on the new python-cairo, as long as whoever submits the new rename review is ok with adding any of them that want it, I don't see an issue. Thoughts? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
