On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:59:28 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 10/21/2013 09:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> * Oldest request is from 2008(!) - but there are recent work on this BZ. > > Probably the same reasons as with the "normal" review requests. > > Sometimes reviews have stalled because of bundled libs, licensing troubles, > > missing deps, waiting for upstream. > > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html > > Yes. > But is this just problem of submiter? I would say that sponsor should lead. And either help to resolve it or suggest to > close it. Having it open indefinitely with false hope is not good. Let's talk about specific tickets then, please. There are various reasons why there may be no progress in some reviews. > >> > * Oldest change on BZs waiting for sponsor is from 2010. > > Which ticket is that? > > Above page lists four tickets from 2011, but all have changed in 2013. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 It's approved since 2009-09-21 -> fedora-review+ It's approved in dist git since 2009--09-22 -> fedora-cvs+ Packager is sponsored -> 2009-09-21 Packager is member of more than a dozen groups in FAS. It's waiting for the submitter to import and build. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=508126 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
