Re: Lack of response about sponsorship

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/10/13 06:45 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
However, activity log shows that you've assigned the ticket to yourself on 2013-03-14 without being a sponsor. The first submitted package of a new packager must be reviewed and approved by a sponsor. Assigning the ticket could result in other sponsors ignoring the ticket and assuming that somebody _is working_ on it already. The review hasn't been too simple either so far, judging by the number of delays and comments by _several_ people over a period of several months.
Delay is due to personal reasons from the submitter hence longer months than expected. Unfortunately, the guideline lacked clarification for reviewing a package from new contributor by the sponsor, I attempted to apply for that position which sadly failed so the process was stuck.

Given the shortage of sponsors, this example shows that a better approach will be required when it comes to new submitter and non-sponsored reviewers so such issue will never occur again in the future.

--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux