On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 20:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > I know this is not the most functional example - but big projects like > distributions and other large projects do have some established > hierarchy - and sometimes they have a process for making those > decisions. Yeah. I'm a little reluctant to get into which projects I think have good structures and which ones I think suck, since I have this fear of ending up on Slashdot or something ;-) plus I may just be ignorant of many of them. I do think we need some structure, don't get me wrong. And I'd like to see it defined. I was also sufficiently involved in defining the GNOME structure to know whether or not I have time to be in charge of defining this one ;-) At the same time I think structure is partly overrated, it does come down to the individual people and how they get along. If you're taking a lot of votes it's a bad sign... Havoc
