Re: prelink performance gains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 15.10.2013 22:17, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:12:00 +0200, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:05:03PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>>> 	i=0;time while [ $i -lt 1000 ];do /usr/bin/gnome-open --help &>/dev/null;i=$[$i+1];done
>>
>> I hope we can all agree that this is not useful example.
> 
> Explained in:
> 	https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190274.html
> 
>> The complexity affects end uesrs. For example, a few years ago, a bad update
>> to prelink broke everyone's systems.
> 
> We are back at the issue that every feature means more code/complexity

*we* are the whole thread about the question if prelinks preformance
gains in thereality are really worth the additional complexity

*you* are *now back* to the issue

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux