Re: prelink performance gains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:25:10PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> 
> >I just do not understand why to give up on that negligible optimization when
> >it brings no disadvantages.
> 
> Because you did not my previous email?
> 
> - complexity
> - complicated prelink blacklists
> - complicated cron job exclusion with sysconfig
> - FIPS foot-bullets
> - reduced alsr
> 
> Other people added:
> 
> - battery drain (i dont care if its cron or not, without prelink no
>   drain)
> - sluggish systems when prelink is updating
> - additional ram use when logged in for a long time

- randomly breaks OCaml programs
- prevents libguestfs AIDE checks from working

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux