On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:11:52PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:59:59 +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I wouldn't read that as saying that prelink is slowing down startup, > > rather that the benefit of prelink is so small as to be indistinguishable > > from the background noise. > > That's the problem we even disagree how to read the numbers. There aren't > enough numbers (+their stats). Well if no one can come up with a way to produce numbers that clearly demonstrate that prelink is useful we should ditch it, regardless due to the complexity / downsides it causes. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
