Hi Sandro, Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend I wanted to work on fedora (your review, but also my packages). It's only today that I've come back to work and started catching up with mails and I'm glad you found someone for the review. I've quickly tried to run a fedora-review when I was sick, but it failed (I've also tried to tweak the command line to review it on fc21, but I still got the missing dep). So I gave up and came back to bed... Please let me know if there is another package of yours to review. Best Regards, Dridi On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > >>> > we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ... >>> >>> I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be approved. >> >> haven't we enter in loop here ?, I think we are waiting for >> rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 , to be able to install devscripts >> without have conflicts with rpmdevtools . > > Don't wait for that, just remove rpmdevtools while reviewing devscripts. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010000#c15 > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
