On 06.10.2013 06:27, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-09-23 at 10:30 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review
here: [1]), I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring
and jetring. Reviews are here:
- jetring: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009996
- debian-keyring: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009997
- ubuntu-keyring: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009998
- perl-Parse-DebControl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009999
- devscripts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010000
(...)
Ok, thanks. I've gone ahead and created a keyrings-filesytem package,
review is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010857
I've also update the other reviews to use this package.
Hi Sandro , sorry I don't had time to look into this, but seems over
packages have a package to have just keyrings-filesytem, can't we group
jetring, debian-keyring and ubuntu-keyring in one package and add
keyrings-filesytem as sub package like pacman package does ?
As for jetring, I don't thinkg that merging unrelated packages (besides
the BR relationship) in the same package just to avoid one additional
package is a good idea?
As for ubuntu-keyring and debian-keyring: I did think of that, but
again, they are effectively different packages. But first thing to see
is what Canonical answers to my enquiry regarding package names
containing ubuntu (they still have not replied to date). If they end up
not allowing us to use their trademark in the package names, then one
approach might be to merge debian-keyring and ubuntu-keyring in
deb-keyring. But personally I'd prefer the current structure.
Other thing, what are dependencies of debian-keyring and ubuntu-keyring
to pbuider or perl-Parse-DebControl ?
perl-Parse-DebControl is just a depdendency for devscripts which is a
dependency for pbuilder. The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Suggests:" if
we had something similar), since pbuilder is not limited to building
packages for debian and ubuntu, but might also be used to build debian
packages using an other mirror.
we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
If anyone wants to finish the review of devscripts to accelerate things,
please do so :)
Best regards,
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
