On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Reartes Guillermo <rtguille@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I guess what I find confusing is when anaconda uses one naming convention in its UI, but upon reboot the installed system uses a different naming convention. >> And neither convention helps me know which of two ethernets are > being used. > > When i installed F19, anaconda wrote the config files as enp* or similar. > Issuing an 'ifconfig' on the installed system revealed that the pXXpX > scheme was active. > > Long story short: I modified config files to match whatever ifconfig > reported and then setup the network.service and its network bridges. > Whatever device names anaconda saw and configured, > these needed to be changed after booting. (i this system > network.service is used inestead of NetworkManager.service). I think ifconfig is going to be, or is, deprecated? I've been using 'ip addr' instead for a while now, and it's always reporting pXpY even though anaconda reports enp* or enc* or whatever. Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
