Re: thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 24/09/2013 12:35, Reindl Harald a écrit :

> and that is why ist *is wrong* to give negative karma because some 
> extension is not updated - who says that the extension RPM is 
> relevant for all users?

I don't agree. Broken dep are not acceptable in "stable" release.

Remi.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJBloAACgkQYUppBSnxahibGACgjOOGCxLIxZn3KL5tBJjD3enc
/3QAni3QwCMVQgXoN1kcDuxgxZJy/qAU
=DXCc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux