Le samedi 30 octobre 2004 Ã 21:28 -0400, Paul Iadonisi a Ãcrit : > On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 21:07, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > [snip] > > > Even in the default case postfix is better. You can run it more > > securely in a chroot jail than you can sendmail, and it's security > > record isn't nearly as blemished as sendmail. > > That blemished past is pretty far in the past. The number of security > holes per year has dramatically decreased in recent years. Note that it > used to be measured in holes/week, but take a look at www.sendmail.org > and you'll see that the last hole was over a year ago. So it's a matter > of preference, really. But I'm hoping this doesn't turn into an all-out > 'my-MTA-is-better-than-yours' religious war. Please let's endeavor to > not let that happen. Even if the sendmail codebase finaly reached the quality of its competitors that's no reason to inflict sendmail conf files on users. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
