Le samedi 30 octobre 2004 Ã 23:20 +0200, Matias FÃliciano a Ãcrit : > Le samedi 30 octobre 2004 Ã 20:58 +0000, Michael A. Peters a Ãcrit : > > Supplying compatability libraries is imho fine. > > But creating a scenario where your operating is more likely to have a > > problem because a vendor doesn't have the will to build their src.rpm > > on the system they intend the package to be installed (thus using the > > modern rpm) on is just absolutely bonkers and is the WRONG thing for > > red hat/fedora to do. > > red hat (RHEL) is a supported product dedicated to Enterprise. It have > to work "out of the box". So, I don't know if it's the wrong thing to do > for RHEL. Given the quality of some of the "enterprise" third-party rpms out there you certainly do not want to lighten install-time checks. They're already doing unholy ops that may hose your system, when this change reaches RHEL I predict a whole world of broken installs RH support will have to rescue. Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
