Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/09/2013 07:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johannbg@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us
defaulting to using short hostnames in login and command prompt when
creating OS containers in any real numbers.
I am pretty sure we should continue to default to "short" hostnames,
i.e. not fqdns.


I am pretty sure we should not since continuing to use short hostname is the worst option of them all since it collides with other "short" hostnames on your network.


The thing is simply that in today's world hosts might appear on multiple
networks and domains at the same time, and that dynamically, and not
necessarily using IP or exposed via DNS. The domain suffix hence is
frequently something that is more interface or state dependent rather
than strictly host dependent. For example, the same host might have an
mdns hostname in .local as well as one ISP assigned hostname on ppp0 and
a hand chosen name on the LAN interface eth0. They might all share the
same non-qualified name, but are hightly like to have different
suffixes. Extending on that: sometimes a machine might be entirely
disconnected, an fqdn then makes very little sense, because it suggests
a world-wide reachable name which is misleading.

Yes it does makes sense and quite frankly using short hostname is the worst option of them all we would be better using ip and or no hostname et all rather then to continue to use short hostnames.


Enforcing a fixed fqdn for a a machine for its entire lifetime is
like enforcing a single fixed IP address for it -- i.e. a setup that
certainly makes sense but is probably not the common case for the vast
majority of modern systems.

?

Lennart I'm not sure what kind of modern system you are using which you can just pick up and walk around with your containers/vm's/servers between networks but feel free to slide one of those modern system to me and I'll happily bring that modern system of yours to the next administrative level ;)

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux