Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/09/2013 11:58 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 09/07/2013 12:52 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Regardless, I think that argument would be an ignorant one:
Approximately no one runs non-ECDH PFS on the web: it's insanely slow
and it breaks clients.

Hmm.  Isn't non-ECDH PFS just straight integer (mod N) Diffie-Hellman?

Yes, it is.

And that's what is insanely slow?

I don't get it, either.

--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux