Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



| From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:38:21 +0200

| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D319901
| 
| looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
| which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
| days in context of PRISM and more and more Ciphers
| are going to be unuseable (BEAST/CRIME weakness)

It might be the case that the NSA has their fingers in these ECC
standards.

Here's a Schneier article worth reading:
  <http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-how-to-remain-secure-surveillance>

In it, he recommends (among many other things):

    Prefer conventional discrete-log-based systems over elliptic-curve
    systems; the latter have constants that the NSA influences when
    they can.

It could be (by accident) that Fedora is more secure due to patents!
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux