Am 06.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: >>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> * there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name >>> >>> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated via the grub2-mkconfig script, which >>> uses settings from /etc/default/grub. >>> >>> /etc/default/grub uses the content from /etc/system-release to set the >>> distributor value: >>> >>> GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)" >>> >>> /etc/system-release contains the name of the Fedora release. >>> >>> Did you change either /etc/default/grub or grub2-mkconfig? >> >> i simply edited /boot/grub2/grub.cfg >> and after that i expect *nothing* to add the release name >> *but* a lter kernel updates is adding it again >> >> i am using Fedor since "Fedora Core 3" and i am maintaining >> more than 20 fedora setups and *before* F19 nobody and nothing >> touched "grub.cfg" due kernel update slike F19 >> >> and as shown before GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR does *not* contain this crap >> [root@testserver:~]$ cat /etc/default/grub | grep DISTR >> GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="Fedora" >> >> this file should not matter as in the past > > Have your filed a BZ? What's the BZ#? don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot as fixed without a specific report and to be honest not existing at all by a wiser release-name selection or drop the useless release-names at all
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
