Hi 28.08.2013 20:31, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > On 08/28/2013 10:41 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:13:09AM -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: >>> Sorry to come out of left field like this, but would the system profile >>> info we collect on install be useful in determining the weight of the >>> need for some of these drivers? For example, if there is still a bunch >>> of SIS video adapters out there, we might prioritize support for that >>> driver, but then not for others that don't show-up in our hardware surveys. >> Another way to look at it is the platform capabilities of these graphics >> devices. For example, Fedora 19's release notes claims a minimum of 1GB >> RAM is required. Were there any pre-PCIe platforms capable of >> supporting this much RAM? > Plenty! The common limitation in the pre-PCIe era was 2GB or 4GB (e.g., > common 32-bit architecture memory limits). I have several that are > non-PCIe and have 2GB of RAM. They run Fedora just fine. They do, > however, have more modern AGP-based video cards installed, however. I > haven't bothered with the embedded video adapter on them, so I cannot > speak to their suitability for running Fedora 19. I have old desktop installation with matrox-mga driver used. Is it will only single VESA driver choose which do smaller resolution for that? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: Hubbitus@xxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
