Re: Bundled Flash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 13:45 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) files,
> but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
> toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.
> :-(
> 
> It has never been permissible to included prebuilt files of this nature in
> Fedora [1], and FPC unequivocally stated during today's meeting that they have
> no interest in making an exception for this.
> 
> Please remove this prohibited content from your packages, or ensure that any
> included .swf files are built from source using a free software toolchain like
> `swfc` during the %build phase.  A list of affected packages sorted by owner is
> included below, and I'll be filing bugs for these soon.
> 
> -T.C.
> 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries
> 
> brummbq owncloud

I've quickly tested and built a 'fix' for owncloud (just dropping the
plugins, really) for F18, F19, F20 and Rawhide. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000257 .
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux