On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:21:38PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:There is no whitelist, but they could be blocked in primary koji I
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200
> Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to
> > actively working on fixing them.
> >
> > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
> > affected packages or a package that depends on one.
> >
> > Package (co)maintainers
> > ===========================================================================
> > libvpd emunson, hegdevasant, fkocina, lnykryn,
> > rrakus, jskala
> > lsvpd emunson, hegdevasant, fkocina, lnykryn,
> > wolfy, rrakus, jskala
>
> these 2 are ppc/ppc64 specific and actively maintained, so they should
> be whitelisted, because they won't have new builds in primary koji
guess.
No they can't, the sync of blocked/new packages is synced over all secondary arches. They could likely be untagged so they don't show up in the list.
Peter
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
