Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:26:45PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > 
> >> FTBFS packages need:
> >>
> >> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
> >> still have earlier dist tags
> > 
> [snip]
> > Nevertheless, as far as I can see there is nothing to do wrt FTBFS for
> > F20.
> 
> The following repoquery shows a number of packages that still have .fc17
> disttags in rawhide and have likely been failing in mass rebuilds:

I see, there was a bug in my script and I sent a new report to give
maintainers a heads up as soon as possible. Nevertheless, since the
FTBFS packages do not seem to have received bug reports, I propose to
delay the removal of the FTBFS packages until the Alpha Change Deadline
(no earlier than 2013-09-03) to work things out.

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux