-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 +0000 (UTC) > > Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime > > > > now right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in > > > > rawhide?=20 > > > > > > > Currently 5.18.0 does not pass one test when running in mock and > > > koji. (It's because of the terminal usage in tested perl > > > debugger.) We think we could have solved this issue in a few days. > > > > Cool. > > > > > Could you explain how the side tag inheritance works? It inherits > > > everything from rawhide, even builds made after the side tag > > > creation, > > > > yes. > > > > > except packages whose builds have been already made in the side > > > tag. Am I right? That means we still get fresh third-party > > > dependencies from rawhide. > > > > yes. However, there's are several downsides: > > > > - Each side tag adds newrepo tasks which increases load a lot. > > - If you rebuild perl-foo-1.0-1 in the side tag against the new > > perl, then the maintainer has to fix something in rawhide, they > > would build perl-foo-1.0-2 in rawhide and when the side tag was > > merged back over either everyone would get the older one with the > > bug, or the newer one against the old perl. So, it's really > > important to not take a long time using a side tag to avoid this > > problem as much as possible. > > Seems like this one came true in practice. It seems like a 5.18 > rebuild run was done in a side tag and then merged back into Rawhide. > Unfortunately, quite a lot of the 5.18 rebuilds seem to have been done > prior to the general F20 mass rebuild - so the mass rebuild won out, > and effectively squelched the perl rebuild. The f20-perl tag was merged back before the mass rebuild was started. so everything in the mass rebuild was built against the new perl. however because the perl rebuild was at a week there was quite a few packages rebuilt against the old perl. we need to work out how to build perl quicker. your analysis is not really correct. Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIBnHcACgkQkSxm47BaWfeWKgCeKSTmyV0Yrn9oulqe3UfCgEFH ZxgAn3vU40FXlBwcxg7hRpyx40OeGdVN =fMp/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
