On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 20:51 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100 > Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > > Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 > > > > DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) > > DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) > > DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl > > (build) > > DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so > > DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl > > (build) > > > > > > debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? > > and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . > > perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18. > > See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the > Perl 5.18 rebuild. > Hi, in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 I see po-debconf, it depends on po4a and perl-Qt . po4a-0.44-11 was rebuilt successfully with perl 5.18 , but po-debconf tried to use po4a-0.44-10 In list is missing (at least) debconf, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13893 I just check now, also needs perl-Qt-devel and debhelper builds https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16206 are in wrong order ..., ausil rebuild first than ppisar. as ausil build fail , shouldn't be resubmitted by ausil ? Thanks and best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
