Re: What about %{_unitdir} macro for arm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-08-05, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into
>> the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer
>> pulled in. on x86 as well as arm.
>
> Several of my packages now fail to build, because more docs are build,
> e.g. PDF versions appeared. Did someone compile a list of packages that
> were added/removed to the buildroot?
>
>> The packages that are explicitly pulled in are:
>> bash  bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release findutils
>> gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip info make patch redhat-rpm-config
>> rpm-build sed shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux which xz
>> 
>> There is no need to BuildRequire  any of them, what they pull in is
>> subject to change and should be added as a BuildRequires
>
> Actually the guidelines say otherwise:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2
>| There is no need to include the following packages or their
>                                                      ^^^^^^^^
>| dependencies as BuildRequires because they would occur too often.
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
And that't terribly wrong and should be removed from the guidelines.

-- Petr

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux