Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:31:48PM +0200, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> There is nothing in the Ring proposal which would make any of this any
> easier as it is. It is not going to be any easier to agree what is 'ring
> 1' than it currently is to agree what is @standard. Only if the rings
> had a defined usecase that would change, but then we could also just
> agree on the usecase for @standard, and judge sendmail in and out
> against that :)

The proposal doesn't _include_ that use-case and definition, but puts making
it as the first next step.



-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux