2 types of OS - headless servers and UI enabled systems. Need to cater for both.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:02 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Mark Bidewell <mbidewel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Splitting apps and OS makes sense. But the "OS" is more then just the
>>
>> No one said that stuff should change "unexpectedly" (and that's not
>> what currently happens either).
>> Actually its the opposite you want to consider the "whole picture"
>> when doing changes and not think
>> of independent pieces stuck together. That's why the "lets build some
>> core platform and put stuff on top
>> of it" is flawed.
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
> Honestly, I keep seeing this argument in this thread, but it doesn't square
> with reality. The concept of an OS and all of its apps as a monolithic
> distribution with a single release schedule is unique to Linux. Every other
> major OS (with the exception perhaps of Windows) strictly differentiates
> between core OS and apps.
kernel and a few low level libraries.
The OS (without apps) goes up to X/wayland and the desktop environment.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
