Am 25.07.2013 21:06, schrieb drago01: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> There might still be bugs in them (and/or in the selinux-policy package). >>> Being more specific would be way more productive. Like "my app tries >>> to do X but fails with the following message" >> >> my app does not exist outside the own infrastrcuture >> > > How does that even matter? That does not mean that your app is unfixable. > Unless it is a closed source thing and your developer left. the developer am i > "I have a custom developed app that tries to do X but then I get an > AVC like ....." is a completely valid bug report. > > You will either get an answer like "do it that way instead and it will > work" or "oh this is a bug fixed in selinux-policy version foo.x.y" you refuse to understand that "do it that way instead" is no otpion for some hundret thousand lines of code working *perfectly* since years and have to work togehter on a whole cluster however, im am not interested to discuss a lifetime-work doing exactly as it should which can be *more* secure as it already is with two lines in a systemd-unit which is done, up and working for hours someone may consider to do the same or not it does not have impact on my workload
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
