On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets > > Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> > > == Detailed description == > A standard directory (/usr/share/assets) for static bits that are intended to > be delivered to web browsers, such as CSS Frameworks, UI libraries, etc. will > be introduced. HTTP daemons in the distribution should make this directory > available publicly as /assets. Minor comment: This copy of the text uses /assets ; the wiki page and the proposed policy uses both /assets and /_assets ; this should be cleared up. More importantly, is it OK to just take over a part of the server's URI namespace like this? If we do so, users won't be able to remap the directory to something else without potentially breaking Fedora-packaged applications. Are we satisfied enough that (presumably) /_assets will not collide with existing applications or installations? (Yes, this is already written in the proposal. I still thought it is worth highlighting to make absolutely sure we have this discussion, because changing the path would be very painful with the current proposal.) Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
