Once upon a time, Paul Wouters <pwouters@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > I understand the query. But you would either need to bypass the local > dns caching resolver or flush the cache afterwards. The second option has > a race condition, but the first has the problem that we are trying to reduce the > number of applications that modify /etc/resolv.conf to one (NM). No, you don't have to bypass or flush the cache. The cache will hold the records whether you request validation or not; the difference is in the answer you get when you query the cache with/without validation requested. > That's not very compatible with other fs'es. What if someone is > upgrading from ext3? Or using brtfs? Or something new? I'd rather see a > more generic method of writing a timestamp to a well known location. ext3 also has the last-written field (I think it goes back to ext2 as well). I don't know about btrfs. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
