----- Original Message ----- > Tomasz Torcz (tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 09:17:56AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > = Proposed System Wide Change: SSD cache = > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSD_cache > > > > > > > Release engineering: All packages should operate in close harmony te > > > > make this > > > > work. Only a rebuild of the relevant packages is required. > > > > > > This doesn't make sense. We're doing a mass rebuild, so all packages > > > are getting rebuild anyway. > > > > > > I'm confused what this Change is actually for. It doesn't sound like > > > an actual planned and targeted set of changes. It seems more of a > > > nebulous "we should get people to do this" proposal. > > > > Yes, I would *guess* it involves: > > - modifing anaconda to allow cache device designation during installation > > (this is more important with bcache, as it needs special formatting; > > dm-cache can be disabled/enabled on the fly) > > - modify dracut to properly attach bcache in initramfs > > - integrate dm-cache handling with local-fs.target > > - finishing SSD caching layer for btrfs > > - (...) ? > > Yeah, I'm confused. If it's just the raw enablers, it's: > - turn on bcache & dm-cache (done) > - add dm-cache to device-mapper userspace (done, IIRC) > - build bcache-tools (don't see a review for it) > > The real system wide change would be the more invasive things Tomasz > mentions above. >From initial look, before it was clarified here, it looked more system wide - kernel changes etc. Now I agree, it changed. Jaroslav > Bill > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
