Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:58:08PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:50:24PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > Or does it mean x86 as PA is out of line?  There are a lot more people
> > > with ARM devices than x86.  Sorry everybody, we're going to have to demote
> > > x86. ;-)
> > False marketing.  Majority of ARM devices out there don't run Fedora and
> > never will.
> 
> Sooner or later, though, we probably _should_ deemphasize 32-bit x86.

The website already links to 64-bit in preference to 32-bit. There's 
arguably reasons to prefer 32-bit in certain memory-constrained 
environments, but there's certainly arguments in favour of (say) 
dropping most of the 32-bit x86 package set and turning it into a 
specialised subset of the overall distribution.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux