Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> llvmpipe has been known to be broken for months, and nobody on the ARM
> team appears capable of fixing it. As a result, ARM shipped in F19
> without any out of the box support for running our default desktop.
>
> This doesn't make it seem like the ARM port currently has sufficient
> developer expertise involved, and I'd really like to hear what the plans
> are for (a) fixing the existing problems, and (b) ensuring that we don't
> end up in a situation where other architectures are held up because
> there's nobody who can fix ARM-specific bugs.

Does the secureboot situation on arm mean that this primary architecture
will eventually be un-bootable for people running a non-redhat signed kernel?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux