Re: Should Boost even be Feature/Change?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Petr Machata <pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>     > The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
>>
>> I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if
>> there was some more detailed descriptions here.
>
> So if the consensus is that Boost rebases don't need this sort of
> paperwork, I'll simply not do it the next time around.

Or, did you mean that Boost Change page is incomplete?

Thanks,
PM
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux