Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category. > > I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if > there was some more detailed descriptions here. Frankly, my biannual filing of Feature/Change page is mostly cargo-culting. It's just rebase, really, even though there are 250 dependers. I like how the Change process forces me to think and argue through some implicit assumptions, but I've been doing this for some time now, and more or less know the drill. In the end we simply need to patch our way out of any build failures, one way or another. So if the consensus is that Boost rebases don't need this sort of paperwork, I'll simply not do it the next time around. Thanks, PM -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
