Re: More unhelpful update descriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/01/2013 02:43 PM, Johannes Lips wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Since this topic comes up every few months, and no one's pointed
>> out the obvious answer yet, I'll say it:
>>
>> * Instead of making up more rules, make the tooling better so
>> we don't have to repeat update descriptions in multiple places. *
> Wouldn't it make sense to perhaps apply different rules or policies for
> different types of packages? I mean we could focus on those applications
> a regular user sees, like all the Office, Internet and Multimedia apps.
> And make the rules for libs and all that stuff, normally only devs are
> interested in, less strict.
> So we always write update comments with the respective target audience,
> making them less technical for all the userspace applications and so on.
> On the other hand, bodhi probably can't distinguish between those two
> types of packages, or?
> 

More rules?

Alex

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux