Re: More unhelpful update descriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-07-02 21:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 14:54 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:

There is already a perfect example of this.

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19

Dan
I went through updates-testing looking for placeholder text (and will
never be doing that again, it's not fun). Of the 422 updates currently
in F19 testing, 12 have the placeholder text as a description:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12227/youtube-dl-2013.07.02-1.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12197/skrooge-1.7.1-1.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12191/libmwaw-0.1.10-1.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12148/perl-Tapper-4.1.1-2.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11891/mingw-libusbx-1.0.15-1.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11820/bacula-5.2.13-12.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11668/dvd
+rw-tools-7.1-13.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9454/openstack-quantum-2013.1.1-5.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7077/salt-api-0.8.1-0.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6012/dnf-0.3.3-3.git91ba5e0.fc19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6947/vboot-utils-20130222gite6cf2c2-3.fc19

This one:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7094/liblangtag-0.5.0-1.fc19
probably should also not be released

Some of these have been sitting in testing since April, so a bit of
extra delay in resubmitting these updates should be tolerable.

I do sometimes wonder if we should have an auto-push for updates that sit in testing for *months*. It's not a dumping ground; if you explicitly don't want an update to go stable for some reason you should probably un-push it until it's ready...

By this point it seems to be the case that, realistically, we are never going to reach the auto-push threshold on some updates. And most updates get submitted with the default +3 auto-push, even though it's perhaps not appropriate for all updates.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux