Am 28.06.2013 17:42, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:09:43 +0200 > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> which does not explain why 3.9.6 and 3.9.7 was not in updates-testing >> and 3.9.7 got there today, a week after it was built and after 3.9.8 >> was built on koji for F17 > > Only the kernel maintainers can answer that. How about we wait and let > them do that? OK >>> If you want to help with this test kernels on the older releases >>> and give appropriate feedback in bohdi for them. >> >> this is a conceptional problem in the Fedora infrastructure > > IMHO, no. > > Only those builds that maintainers desire to push out as updates are > pushed out as updates. There's many reasons why someone would build > something but not push it out (yet) IMHO, yes. if i install kernel from koji on several machines and have a option to give karma if it works it would be in any case a useful information for the maintainers which is indepedent from what they desired intentionally > Perhaps there was a very nasty bug and they wanted a reporter to > confirm. > > Perhaps they did the build, but discovered some bug in their testing > after the build completed then kernel.x86_64 3.9.7-100.fc17 would not have been pusehd to updates-testing a week after build today, henceif the package would have any hint that it is a security-update on koji i would have tested and deployed it days ago, that is why we run test environments for production-servers running Fedora old-stable to not wait for karma of random users which may never happen - but not for each random build with no indication of security-fixes http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=428473 does not have any security hint in the changelog
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
